> pudmed

A more appropriate typo I haven't seen in a while. I'd definitely read pudmed.

(For those with English as a second language, "pud" is a folksy abbreviation for "pudding".)

So let's say the aim is to optimize personal supplements use in the context of a medical condition.

You could follow the paper results as written.

But everything is statistical and youre and individual.

Isn't there a better way?

I'm not in a position to answer but finer non invasive tests about your own body state so you can adjust and reflect on your case rather than averages.