There is nothing ironic about expressing experience and knowledge which informs the position in debate.

My history informs my claim, but I'm not saying that my experience defacto overrides or invalidates any other claim, experiential or otherwise.

Perhaps it would be ironic if I refuse to hear contrary ideas due to my special class as a victim. I did not do this and think it is toxic to debate.

Moreover, I specifically don't identify as a victim.

The important thing is that you've figured out a way to be superior to both.

Both what?

Do you not believe that some people are more knowledgeable or can have insights on any topic.

Do you have a point you are trying to make?