Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

More strikes indicates the union is less powerful - a powerful union never has to strike, because they always get what they want just through fear of a strike.


I think you have it backwards.

Unless the threat is exercised every once in a while, it is not taken seriously.

German and French companies know that unions are capable of and willing to go on strike if their demands are not met. That gives companies a much larger incentive to make concessions.

The Warnstreiks I mentioned earlier are a tool for reminding companies every once in a while that the possibility of a strike exists. They're often used during contract negotiations, when the union doesn't feel the company is giving enough.


So unless we nuke a country every once in awhile it's not taken seriously?

The last rail strike was adverted at the last moment, like it often is, so I suspect the railroad union is not weak.


I'm going to suggest that nuclear weapons and labor strikes are sightly different types of things.


Sure, but the point is that you can have a tool/weapon that the very fear of using it is enough to get people in line.

The teacher's unions very rarely strike, they must be very weak?


Given the low salaries and poor working conditions that teachers in the US generally face, yes.

It seems, however, that teachers are getting fed up, and there's finally been a bit more strike activity by teachers in the US over the last 4 years.


The railroad union settled without strike for no sick days. It is weak.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: