Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I mean the simplest one is gravity; the most scalable version of that is pumping water up into a reservoir behind a hydroelectric power plant. There's others that propose heavy trains going uphill or weights down a hole, but that doesn't scale very well and has additional maintenance costs.

But yeah, that would be electrical into mechanical energy (pumps), the cost would be flowing water up against gravity. Of course, it also requires a source of water downhill and a reservoir uphill. I was going to quip about Lake Mead being empty, but that would be huge distances to cover. Maybe something close to sea, or else a purpose built closed loop system.



Pumped hydro is great where it works, but we have used most of the best places for it. We also know it is an environmental disaster for the local area which needs to be balanced against the gain.

Even if you ignore that, it takes a lot of space.


And you think that isn't done already? If every country was like Norway, this would be the way to go. But good look doing this in the Netherlands.


There are plenty of "battery" technologies that are not perfect, but substantially better than Hydrogen(in terms of round trip efficiency) though. Several startups with sound ideas. If only Governments picked them up in war like emergency and threw their capital at it to progress. 1. https://energydome.com 2. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-61996520 3. https://newatlas.com/energy/china-100mw-compressed-air/ 4. https://www.hydrostor.ca




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: