Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sorry, am not really smarter about all of this after reading the blog post. Maybe I just don't know enough quantum physics? Maybe science communication itself has a problem? How can I check this information without investing 10 years of my life?


It says there wasn't really any wormhole. Instead there was something intended to simulate some ideas about wormholes.

It's as if someone claimed he had a car and said he'd pick me up for a date ... but it turned out he actually had no car, only iRacing.


Yeah, but afterwards he mentions that colleagues of his actually think that something special here might have happened after all, because of quantum, and he admits that therefore he is not QUITE sure himself about it. So in the end, the conclusion is that it probably is just a simulation, but maybe it is more? Does that not counter the entire thrust of the blog post?


I reread it, and I still see 100% denial that there was any wormhole. Can you quote something else?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: