> There is no “limited liability” for criminal sanction to which the term applies. There are criminal immunities,

Huh? My dude, she didn’t work for FTX.

If you’re saying that she in fact did (and was therefore a co-conspirator), then we agree that FTX was a sham corporation that acted on behalf of Alameda, but then why are we here?

Oh yeah, because you wanted to sound smart without fully understanding a situation; I guess I already knew that.