Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>As the ASN operator don't they have a legal duty to shut down illegal operations from their network?

Noooooooooooo

I mean I'm not a lawyer, I'm not even American, but I think that if they demonstrate that have the capability to police that sort of thing they become responsible for policing it. Where as responding to (or even forwarding) cease and desist letters opens them up to much less culpability.

In modern times I'd worry that actively trying to prevent piracy, taking concrete steps like blocking torrent protocols, could mean that you're no longer protected by safe harbour provisions in the DMCA. You start acting like you have the capability to be responsible for your users actions and then lose all kinds of safe harbour and common carrier provisions. It's part of the reason why ISPs don't use more aggressive traffic shaping, start blocking pirate sites and you start being responsible for all the pirate sites you missed.



That is why a network operator might try discouraging this activity through their pricing structure. The self-interest of a network operator is to be not getting complaints and demands about the activities of the customer and many network operators would rather a person who generates complaints go be a customer of some other operator and if that can be done with no customer contact all the better.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: