Thanks. But neither of those sources matches your initial description.
The first is not anyone "admitting" anything in a "court case". Nor does it discuss "where user data is stored" or "what systems have access to it". It is quotes from an email discussion on some article, about the behavior of a UI toggle, with no indication that these are people working on that system who would be expected to know where data is stored but don't.
In the second link you've at least got a deposition, but how is either of those paraphrases relevant to your claim about "not knowing where user data is stored" or "what systems have access to it"?
The first is not anyone "admitting" anything in a "court case". Nor does it discuss "where user data is stored" or "what systems have access to it". It is quotes from an email discussion on some article, about the behavior of a UI toggle, with no indication that these are people working on that system who would be expected to know where data is stored but don't.
In the second link you've at least got a deposition, but how is either of those paraphrases relevant to your claim about "not knowing where user data is stored" or "what systems have access to it"?