Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> because everything it mentions is the product of the outgrowth of Node, NPM... and that subtree exists within the JS ecosystem.

Where subtree constitutes ~90% or more of the ecosystem.



Yeah? Have you measured it?

Aside from that, do you have anything meaningful to say about the points actually raised? Let's take your claim as a given. If it were 2003 instead of 2023 and people kept bringing up, say, problems with Windows but refused to speak about them in those terms—instead insisting on framing with a generalization about "computers"—would that have been acceptable on the basis that 90+% of the world is using Windows? It plainly wouldn't have, and that's true for a case where we actually know that we were dealing with numbers of 90% or more, and not just lazy attempts at retorts that are fired from the hip and by a reasonable guess probably won't actually hold up under scrutiny, anyway.


> Aside from that, do you have anything meaningful to say about the points actually raised?

You didn't raise points. You went off on a rant by completely dismissing the tongue-in-cheek article about tooling issues in the frontend space as something about "node-only".

All the points the author raised are:

- about frontend aka client-side

- about javascript ecosystem

And this ecosystem is ubiquitous. Much more ubiquitous than "no, this is not frontend, I do client-side and I don't use it".

> If it were 2003 instead of 2023 and people kept bringing up, say, problems with Windows but refused to speak about them in those terms—instead insisting on framing with a generalization about "computers"

See? This is not a point. This is argument by analogy. You're pretending that this analogy is valid (it isn't) and you're expecting me to argue with you.


> this ecosystem is ubiquitous

I wrote a perfectly lucid response which you ignored completely. Your choosing to ignore it, or to read it as if it means something other than what it does, does not mean that I don't have a point (wat).

> Much more ubiquitous than "no, this is not frontend, I do client-side and I don't use it".

Who are you quoting (and what is it even supposed to mean, besides)?

> you're expecting me to argue with you

Nope.


> I wrote a perfectly lucid response which you ignored completely.

I wrote why, and you definitely literally ignored what I wrote.

> Who are you quoting (and what is it even supposed to mean, besides)?

I'm very shortly representing what you wrote. So it's for you to answer what this means.

> Nope

Yup. Otherwise you wouldn't resort to bad analogies.

Anyway. This is going nowhere.

Adieu.


> I'm very shortly representing what you wrote.

No, you aren't—and the point at which you are attempting to explain what it is that I really meant or was thinking (explaining me... to me) is the point at which you have stumbled upon a strong indicator that you have lost the plot. Viz:

> Yup [you are expecting me to argue with you]




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: