Nobody said anything if the sort. The point is a lot of these “studies” are not reproducible (or in this case literally made up.). So what it does it matter if the average voter reads then?
How about we stop trying to force “policies” on a population who doesn’t care about them and using unscientific studies to convince them they need it. I’m sure you’ll have a snarky remark to this, in which case don’t bother.
If you are genuinely confused about my reply, I suggest you reread the post you responded to and then reread your own post, focusing on what you were saying in the context of the post you responded to.
It's unclear if you're saying "listen to the good studies, don't listen to the bad studies" with no explanation as to how we separate the two ex ante, or you're just saying "don't make policies based on scientific understanding", or you're just saying don't make policies.
None of these is actually a viable approach to, well, anything.
