Do you agree with the conclusions about it being better to change the law (since it is supposed to work for all of us) rather than attempting to subvert it?
I think eventually some smaller nations will catch on and become secure offshore data and processing hubs, just as today there is an entire economy around offshore finance. We will probably look back at DataCo as being a few decades ahead of time.
I believe in using purely software or technical means where possible (PGP to defeat unlawful wiretaps, Start-TLS to protect against echelon), followed by social pressure (i.e. "it's rude to rip off someone's work", vs. enforcing it with laws).
Do a good job of articulating socially good uses. PGP to protect you from spies is unrealistic, PGP to protect you from the law if you are a criminal is both unrealistic and bad PR, but filevault to protect my SSN when your laptop is stolen, that's a much easier win -- it's just hard technically and inertia, but those are easier than active political or legal opposition to overcome.
In parallel with that, try for political change, ideally using tech as much as possible to support that -- I wasn't an Obama voter, but what the 2008 campaign did with social media was transformative.
If all those fail, sure, consider doing something crazy like Sealand or offshore corporations or whatever, but ultimately I'd rather live in a first-world country WITH good laws, than something with technical or jurisdictional hacks.
Nauru is (or was) trying to do this. http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/253/t... is where I heard about it, but this story aired almost a decade ago so I don't know what's happened since. I assume it didn't pan out. Nauru is kind of hard to get information on, because of its obscurity and isolation.
I think eventually some smaller nations will catch on and become secure offshore data and processing hubs, just as today there is an entire economy around offshore finance. We will probably look back at DataCo as being a few decades ahead of time.