Often when the news media says that the pope has endorsed something, they're actually talking about a Vatican spokesperson or one of its departments, or a mention in the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano.
Because the Register article doesn't make it clear whether Pope Francis himself or a representative of the Vatican gave an endorsement, I started looking up information in other sources.
But in practically every article I could find that mentioned Miron Mironiuk and "Code With Pope," the information about the papal endorsement came from Mironiuk.
I could not find any articles that directly quote a Vatican source, or the pope himself, as endorsing this project.
So until I can find some kind of credible source beyond Mironiuk's say-so, I am going to assume that he got some sort of recognition or general note of encouragement from someone in the Vatican. But it's doubtful that Pope Francis himself is partnering with this one app developer.
I'm glad you caught that because as a Catholic this has been a source of tremendous annoyance to me - the pope must be one of the most misquoted people in the modern era. So much so that I routinely just ignore "pope says" type articles.
If course even if he did say that it doesn't touch on morals or dogma so it's just a guy voicing his personal opinion. It would just be weird for him to voice it using his religious platform.
That said it is likely that some group in the Vatican has started a teach kids to code program under their charity wing. As to how effective such programs are - I'm skeptical. There are already lots of great python resources online - is this going to be geared towards Catholic kids and parents to help that niche get interested in code?
> If course even if he did say that it doesn't touch on morals or dogma so it's just a guy voicing his personal opinion. It would just be weird for him to voice it using his religious platform.
I find that hard to accept. He is the Pope. It's like thinking a country's president saying something that isn't directly political is just voicing his opinion as a private citizen.
I doubt a single Australian thought the then Prime Minister Bob Hawke was making a political statement, proposing a new national holiday, or doing anything other than voicing an opinion as a private citizen when he celebrated the Australian win against the USofA in the America's Cup Race.
To be honest, I do think he is on some level speaking for Australians in general. Not formally speaking for the state of course, but the only reason we care about his opinion is that he is a national leader and not a private citizen.
We (Australians) also care about his opinion because he was an avid sportsman and took out a British record for downing a yard glass of beer.
Although I suppose the law degree and Rhodes scholarship add a little weight.
The main point here, though, is we are able to seperate his personal opinions from his role as Prime Minister just as I would hope that many Catholics would be able to seperate the opinions of the Pope on Python (if in fact there were any, given that this entire story seems to lack a direct primary Pontiff quote) from the Pope's official statments re: Catholicism and the wider Christian beliefs.
I suspect however that perhaps devout members of a religious flock that regard a person as a direct agent of God on earth might be less discerning about that person's opinions than the citizens of a democratic country are about the opinions of their temporay prime political representative particulalry as a good number of those citizens might not even support that representative.
TLDR: democratic citizens are likely more critical of their ephemeral leaders than religuos flocks are about their designated "voice of the lord".
Saying the Pope is "the voice of God" is inaccurate. He is an appointed leader who gets the last word on certain issues. There are plenty of Catholics critical of any Pope even with regard to his opinions on Catholic beliefs. Take a look at what rad trad Catholics say about the current Pope, for example.
The extent to which Catholics would give extra weight to the Pope's opinions outside his official role varies wildly. Much the same is true of any leader: e.g. the weight given to the opinions of a president of a democratic country by their supporters and opponents. The last president of the US is a particularly good example of this :)
Fellow Catholic here, it’s interesting that Jorge Bergolio has chosen to endorse a computer programming language named after a serpent. I hope they won’t be using any Apple products for this project otherwise , truly, the prophetic forerunner of the antichrist and the end times have arrived.
Never miss an opportunity to be a kill joke!!!
Python was named after Monty Python the British comedy group.
If you have not watched them, I highly recommend.
Likewise, any decisions made by a Canadian federal or provincial department are, by law, made by the responsible minister. In (obvious) reality, this is would be a decision made a lower level employee that has delegated signing authority to make it work within the framework of the law.
I'm not much of one for Christian theology, but there is a lot of wisdom in the document. I especially like rules 14 through 19, I think those principles are found across faiths and creeds, and worthy of aspiration.
He did consider his own language - "Holy C", but many found the default font ("Roman baptismal") was supposed to be mono-spaced but ended up looking tri-spaced.
Correct (in a `try ... else` the else branch is executed when the try block reaches the end of the block with no exception, and the return is leaving the block without reaching the end)
(Bonus context for anyone surprised that it is valid code — Python actually allows you to use “else” in more places than you’d expect - `for ... else` is my favourite (do a for loop over a list of things, `break` if you find the thing that you’re looking for, and then the `else` branch will be taken if you don’t find what you’re looking for. Much cleaner than keeping track of a separate i_found_the_thing bool IMO))
Taking the joke a bit too seriously, but that is a statement of moralistic therapeutic deism, not Christianity.
Corrected code.
from behaviour import repentance
from afterlife import Heaven, Hell, Limbo
if person.is_baptised:
if (person.state == repentance):
return Heaven
else:
return Hell # FIXME define Hell
else:
# TODO I think we need something with Limbo here
return None
Well, if that code was written at any point after the 12th century, you need to add Purgatory. Also, for Limbo, you need to never have heard of the Catholic Church, so you probably need some kind of information tainting.
With the traffic between this world and the afterlife, using exceptions like this is really inefficient. Furthermore, a lot of souls with net bad behavior might be in a state of Grace, rescuing them from Hell.
Although, given the moral ambiguity of the spec, it might be better to use a language with more undefined behavior like C. Terry Davis addressed a lot of this when he built the third Temple in HolyC.
I actually work parttime at a startup where we're trying to use web3 to establish permanent, digital identities that you can use in the afterlife to bargain with demons. The idea is, you can use an NFT (who says web3 is dead!) to correlate the atoms in the immortal eternal one-soul with their constituent souls on earth, so you can identify your friends in Heaven (or Hell). Eventually, we hope to even link people on earth to people on heaven, via our Rust-based AngelLink blockchain. A sort of "tower to the heavens" so to speak.
If anyone else on HN is interested in this space, feel free to email me (darigo.maxwell at gmail dot com). Always looking to make new friends who love God and have a passion for big data and the thirst for God's presence.
I think it's a lot better as it is. A python is a snake. And it's about coding. That way the headline is somehow related to the content of the article.
The Catholic Church, proving again that they take the century-long view of their commitments. (At least, I think Scheme will remain a tasteful choice for that long.)
I don't know what the future holds, but I know that after cameras were perfected we continued to sketch and paint. And I think I will write code until the day I die, because programming is important to me regardless of whether it's an economic necessity. (For that matter, I'll continue writing English for consumption by other humans, no matter how good LLMs get, because it's an important part of my life.)
I don't know about that. Robots are still mostly shit so there are a load of manual jobs that would be needed after programmers are replaced by AI. I expect the oldest career would be the last one too.
That said, I can't see programmers being actually fully replaced by AI until we have properly strong AI and at that point society as we know it is probably over.
Robots only look bad because we keep trying to make them work in spaces and processes optimized for bipedal meatbags, essentially forcing us to build a machine analog of that meatbag. Take a few steps back and you will realize most things are only done a certain way because it uniquely suits us. Many jobs also don't have to exist for a certain process to work and could be trivially automated, but people want them to exist (because we value human interaction and the presence of a human can be reassuring). Another reason that many things aren't automated is that human labor is comparatively cheap and upending your process, developing new machines is expensive.
> Robots are still mostly shit so there are a load of manual jobs that would be needed after programmers are replaced by AI.
Design your space with automation in mind, and you have the reverse situation. To illustrate: If you tried replacing machines in an automated factory line with humans, you may come to the conclusion that meatbags are mostly shit.
Because the Register article doesn't make it clear whether Pope Francis himself or a representative of the Vatican gave an endorsement, I started looking up information in other sources.
But in practically every article I could find that mentioned Miron Mironiuk and "Code With Pope," the information about the papal endorsement came from Mironiuk.
For example, this article from the BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-67209806
I could not find any articles that directly quote a Vatican source, or the pope himself, as endorsing this project.
So until I can find some kind of credible source beyond Mironiuk's say-so, I am going to assume that he got some sort of recognition or general note of encouragement from someone in the Vatican. But it's doubtful that Pope Francis himself is partnering with this one app developer.