Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I get what you're saying, but nutrition is probably not a great example because we know nearly nothing about it. It's not ok to lock someone in a room and force-feed them for years to get data.

Anyways, that aside, what's insane to me is that there is a nearly-simultaneous story of the Opioid epidemic and people aren't losing their minds over this.



So we shouldn't research nutrition until we know more about it?

(Insert Spock eyebrow because this concept fails to compute for me.)


My point is you're putting the cart before the horse - you don't research individual genetic diets before you research generic diets


It's possible to investigate whether diets produce beneficial results in subgroups even without having a proper general model of diet and nutrition.

It's analogous to investigating whether drugs produce beneficial results in people with X disease even without having a proper model of how exactly X disease works.


That also makes no sense to me.

It's like saying you need general recommendations for sun exposure before you can research specific recommendations based on skin type/ethnicities.

It's nonsense. Pale-skinned Caucasions need different recommendations from other ethnic groups with more baseline melanin.


We don't know that pale-skinned Caucasians need different recommendations in this scenario. That's the point. We barely know anything about nutritional science, let alone what one specific race of people needs.

If you have no clue how sun exposure actually affects the body beyond "ow burn hurt", you don't have the necessary knowledge to begin creating highly specific treatments. What would you base the science on? There's no real foundation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: