Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That makes good sense and I think all those that are not independently wealthy already except personal friends of either Sam or high level remainers are going to do something quite similar. It's just too fluid a situation to make good decisions, especially if your livelihood is at stake, better not to make decisions that can't be easily undone.


Given that the total comp package is $300k base + $600k profit share, I don’t think any of their livelihoods are at stake. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36460082

You’re probably right because people usually don’t have an appetite for risk, but OpenAI is still a startup, and one does not join a startup without an appetite for risk. At least before ChatGPT made the company famous, which was recent.

I’d follow Sam and Greg. But N=1 outsider isn’t too persuasive.


OpenAI isn’t a normal startup. It was founded as a research focused not for profit. That 300k+ base comp isn’t what I’d consider “risky” either. Career wise it never seemed risky as some of the fields top AI researchers were there from day almost one.


> I’d follow Sam and Greg.

Once the avalanche has stopped moving that's a free decision, right now it could be costly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: