Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The board can easily back up their public claim. They don't.

Even the email to their own employees says it is a irreconcilable difference. Nothing about lying.

I don't think it is reasonable to go with "we don't know". It is more like: "it is crucial to back up your claim. Still, you don't.".



I don't disagree. It's just maybe they have something they haven't shared or maybe they don't. We don't know (yet).


The fact that they didn't follow up with evidence immediately shows that they are incompetent.

You don't just accuse someone of committing a heinous crime and stay silent. What is the detail?


True, but are they obliged to provide all details to the public?


No, but they are also not obliged to accuse Sam of lying either. But here we are.

You think accusing someone of lying in a public statement and don't follow up is competent?


I agree with you




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: