Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Going back to the open core/demo versions

aka, just sell software, rather than make it open source.

What is being balked at is the idea that you can use open-source as a foot-in-the-door marketing and growth hack, which you then reap after some level of popularity/network effect is reached. Some call it bait and switch.

Blaming big corps for "leeching" is just self-serving. They are doing exactly what the license allows them to do - a license for which was chosen at the start to allow for it! If you expected to be paid to make this software, don't opensource it.



Or perhaps open source it in exchange for being paid, something that developers working for corpos which contribute to (FL)OSS already do.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: