Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Classic property of medical science. The science of trials and errors. We know what works, under which conditions and doses and what side effects it may have. Thats useful, important and urgent with real consequences.

The "why" costs money, resources and an itch for genuine curiosity and ingenuity with mostly negative returns. So it remains unknown, while we focus on the combining 2 or more things we already know and see where that can be sold.

Another observation here is there's a lot of money riding on "pseudo science". See any superfood or beauty products for example. You take a data point that is demonstrated under certain conditions in a controlled environment. Make that single data point a centerpiece of evidence, tack the usual goop on it, market it, label it and place it on the front aisles of Trader Joe's. Now there's a lot of incentive to keep the "why" away from consumers walking those aisles.



God, what a depressing take


How is it depressing? If we waited for scientist's to fully understand the outcomes of their experiments prior to experimenting we’d still be living in caves. As long as the experimentation happens at a small enough scale, the “worst case” scenario is limited. What’s depressing is when things are scaled up in spite of an established body of evidence that such things are harmful.


The depressing part is the billions wasted on supplements, "superfoods" and health drinks that have pretty much zero evidence of effect behind them.

Turmeric is sold for like a dollar a pill. It's pure horseshit.


Humans have functioned like this as far back as there are records. There's been weird unfounded health crazes for centuries. In the 1920s health spas were putting radon rocks in their pools because radiation was the new health craze.


Consumers are lucky to get just horseshit instead of lead based yellow colorant.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: