> But hey, if a random anonymous internet expert says that all it takes to revive a project is a week of browsing through the source code then that must be true.
I think the claim of "a week" is probably very wrong, but it's probably possible, at least in some capacity.
However, I think that the actual problem is how badly a lot of software is currently developed. Codebases without proper README files or code comments, even, no proper CI/CD setups in a lot of places and so on. In part, I think it is because developers don't really care about those that will come after them, or because having good discoverability isn't a blocker to get something working or even shipping software. If the situation is absolutely crap in web dev, I fear to think how much worse it is in other industries.
I think the claim of "a week" is probably very wrong, but it's probably possible, at least in some capacity.
However, I think that the actual problem is how badly a lot of software is currently developed. Codebases without proper README files or code comments, even, no proper CI/CD setups in a lot of places and so on. In part, I think it is because developers don't really care about those that will come after them, or because having good discoverability isn't a blocker to get something working or even shipping software. If the situation is absolutely crap in web dev, I fear to think how much worse it is in other industries.