I'm curious, what do libertarian types think of the per-mile car insurance deals that require the driver to install a surveillance device on their own vehicles?
I haven't talked much in those same circles after the forum was destroyed by a ban-happy Republican-lite takeover, but possible things that come to mind are:
1. It's philosophically acceptable since it's not the government doing it, even if I don't like the deal.
2. I shouldn't be forced to have insurance in the first place.
3. That wouldn't happen since I could buy insurance from another competitor that doesn't require it.
Or grocery store checkout, where there is an individual dollar amount associated with every single item in your cart and calculating the total amount due requires knowing the entire contents of the cart.
