This is great, but you can vibe this and have your own custom version hitting free weather services and getting the specific info you want without making global calls to a service that might not stick around. Also, when you make calls from a terminal, it could expose your server as one they might want to try to attack, because you might have access that they want and might be gullible enough to use random services, so your security might not be great. Even if the developer is well-intentioned, the person that takes over their domain later might not be. Curl has vulnerabilities, though.
This is getting ridiculous. To propose accepting any random LLM suggestion for a random endpoint would be more trustworthy and reliable than a service which has been developed, trusted, and working for a decade… Equally nonsensical are the server exposure claims.
These comments are getting absurd, and are worryingly coming more and more from new accounts. Are you yourself a bot designed to spam communities and hype coding with LLMs?
That’s not what they’re saying. They’re saying that you could write code to do this and not be visiting some random page that targets you or potentially exploits vulnerabilities in curl.
"You can vibe this" means getting an LLM to create it, not writing the code yourself. That's what people mean when they use the term "vibe coding" (or just "vibing" in their comment).
Though vibe coding doesn't prohibit the human from making the decision on which weather API to use, so of all the criticisms to make about LLM use I don't actually agree with the person you replied to who suggested it has to mean "accepting any random LLM suggestion for a random endpoint".
