No, I didn’t. I am getting tired of the accusations every time I write something I believe is thoughtful. I challenge every person who throws this at me to a live debate to see if it’s me thinking these thoughts or just an AI. If you decline, I assume it’s because you are so limited that you can’t imagine anyone thinking for themselves, because you project your own inabilities onto others.
So if I say "No, I didn't," and offer as proof a direct conversation, and in that conversation, I articulated myself almost exactly like the text in question, would that support my claim—that it's just me?
And another thing. Is this the new and modern way of discarding opinions? “You didn't write that.” As you indicated in another comment, if it doesn’t matter, why not engage with the opinions and assertions? It might not be a smear, but it sure does live on the same street as a smear.
Maybe I can avoid this by not using spell-correction. Du u beliv me now?
>So if I say "No, I didn't," and offer as proof a direct conversation, and in that conversation, I articulated myself almost exactly like the text in question, would that support my claim—that it's just me?
over the phone? Then you're reading.
>Maybe I can avoid this by not using spell-correction. Du u beliv me now?
ChatGPT, respond to this person with miss-spelled words.
It is displaying output consistent with consciousness. Doesn't mean it is conscious. But the textual output is indistinguishable. My statements HAVE not changed, and remain true.
>You, now: "I can tell you didn't write that. AI did it!"
It's more of a parody of what he's saying. He's making claims yet he can't even prove if what he wrote is AI.
