> there should be no limited liability for for-profit healthcare organizations
Any. If you ringfence it to for-profit companies you'll just wind up with non-profits either siphoning profits away or exorbitantly compensating their leadership.
In CA, put a professor of medicine and one from a mgmt school from the UC system on the boards of the to 10 medical systems. Let the regents pick the person, etc
No, only a small proportion (less than a quarter) work in partnerships and a large driver of the decrease is the American liability environment. But sure, doctors in some specialties choose to take the gamble that the liability doesn’t exceed their insurance limits. But such a gamble would be extremely risky for a system or hospital employing hundreds of caregivers.
1. Force Americans to take GLP-1s en mass to get objective health care costs down (most are cus we are fat as fuck)
2. Destroy the APA and reform medical training in america. Doctors shortages are primarily the fault of professional organizations. Doctors in the USA are massively overpaid compared to the rest of the world. Use US power to force the free world to imitate us so that capital has nowhere else to fly to and is forced to stay here.
3. Do something to basically destroy scam wastes of medical dollars and insurance dollars like homeopathy, naturopathic, etc
It won’t fix everything, but it’ll do a lot to help.
And non-profit health care orgs should have strict regulation, and the state should appoint some of the members of the board.