Now, if only there was some way to distinguish between the performance of the players and the performance of the umpires. Oh! Oh! I know! Players don't have to be perfect, but umpires do! Yes, now we have really gotten at the spirit of competition: who is the best physically, vs "the umpire screwed up and blew the call, this is fun!"
Is this even a serious argument? Come on. I would almost think you were trolling, conflating the performance of the umpires vs the performance of the players, were this not HN.
I think it would 100% work for someone who truly finds the "most-fun part of baseball" "having a correctly called game by the rules".
Initially I was going to argue that that's a silly thing to prioritize in a game, but it's a matter of taste and I'm not going to tell you what to like or not. It's not like you said that you liked arguing with your friends or something.
In all seriousness though, sure, everyone wants a fair game, but there's limitations. For instance, I only watch minor league baseball, and it's not because they got the pitch clock and ABS first, it's because the teams aren't completely optimized like the majors, and the game isn't as refined - it's closer in spirit to the first game of baseball ever played.
Frankly, I'd rather watch a pick-up game without an umpire if it weren't weird (and I could get a beer and some hotdogs).
Long story short (too late), baseball's a lot of different things to a lot of different people. The stats, the camaraderie, the competition, or the culture around the game itself. If you prized a game going off like clockwork, I couldn't fault you, even if that doesn't factor into my love of the game at all.
Guaranteed perfectly-called games every time.
Doesn't sound particularly fun to me, but to each their own.