2160 per eye- so a bit more than that in width… I’m thinking if you do 2x pixel ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		jasonjmcghee 69 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Steam Machine 2160 per eye- so a bit more than that in width… I’m thinking if you do 2x pixel density it could look pretty clean. But that’s not a whole lot of real estate… that being said, i remember when 1280x1024 was incredible and that’s the same ballpark as what you’d get.

u8080 69 days ago | [–]

This is not directly comparable with display resolution since actually you are looking for PPI per degree of vision to judge on clarity.

yencabulator 68 days ago | [–]

That's 2160 pixels over ~110 degrees field of view. How many degrees of your view does your monitor cover? The density comes out very different.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact