Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They said “charging more than free” - i.e., more than $0, i.e., they’re not free. It was awkwardly worded.


They said "instead of charging more than free", which means should be free.

Please read it again.


I think we’re in violent agreement, but you were ambiguous about what “cost” meant. It seems you meant “cost of providing NAT” but I interpreted it as “cost to the customer.”

> Please read it again.

There’s no need to be rude.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: