Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bro, there’s something really wrong with your head if you seriously believe that the gist of the story is “eating shit is entertainment”.


A better gist may be the value of entertainment is temporary.

If instead it was just one person and they went to a movie theater. If you ignore the entertainment value it may just look like the person through away the admission cost.


Why else would the economist offer the other to eat shit if not for entertainment? Like what other purpose would it reasonably be?


They don’t call it the dismal science for nothing!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: