Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My read is that it's immoral because it's a surveillance hijack without the knowledge of the users, as opposed to an opt-in.


And its not just opt in for the camera owner/licensor it should be explicitly optin for anyone who gets recorded


In the US, you don't have an expectation of privacy in public places.


I'm in the US. I have an expectation of privacy in public places.


I suppose you can expect whatever you want, but the law is not on your side.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: