Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting, I wonder why they didn't go with something more self explanatory:

  Connection: -> X-Ignore-X:


X-Ignore-X is longer than close, which I suppose would mess up the packet length. Or maybe having an unrecognized value for the Connection key would still default to a close? Just guessing here.


TCP checksums are fairly simple; a TCP stack basically just sums up the 16-bit words in a packet and stores the result in the checksum field; this will not detect 16-bit words being swapped around.

My guess is that the load balancer tried to invalidate the header while preserving the TCP checksum.


Ah yes, forgot about the checksum field :) thx


I meant:

  Connection: close
replaced with

  X-Ignore-X: close




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: