Don't get me wrong, sometimes 'copying' is great when somebody truly believes they can solve a problem better, but that doesn't seem the case here — the only new feature I see is that you can add a bounty to your question; other than that, I see no advantage over Yahoo! Answers.
Calacanis' playbook is to add features early and often. Their 'answers' feature is an example of this. Their long term strategy is all about content, or pages with aggregated content/links that help people find the content they need. It's actually a great idea, instead of relying on Google's algorithm 100% to serve the right results, Mahalo is employing people to aggregate the content.
Yahoo's 1994 playbook is to add features early and often. Their 'answers' feature is an example of this. Their long term strategy is all about content, or pages with aggregated content/links that help people find the content they need.
It's actually a great idea, instead of relying on Google's algorithm 100% to serve the right results, Yahoo in 1994 is employing people to aggregate the content.
That's right... we try a LOT of different things, put them in the lab and test them in the real world. We're getting over 5m uniques a month and the largest growing part of the site is the direct traffic to Mahalo Answers.
IF anyone wants to try Mahalo Answers create an account and email me at jason at Mahalo.com and I'll put M$5 in your account to play with. 60 days in where getting fairly good answers to a range of questions.
its interesting that that is how search engines began -- directories, we've got toward algorithms, and now we're pushing back to "manual" content assignment.
Is this because no one can do it as well as google, so we're having to provide different methods?
By the way, I was chatting to Jason the other day about the tipping/bounty feature:
"So far the tipping results in 2-10x the amount of response... so clearly it works. Give it time! :-)"
Maybe it was worth re-creating Yahoo's service just for that one extra feature, we'll see! (Though it won't have been if search engines penalise them for cheap tactics like this.)
Calacanis once mentioned that they moderate these heavily, and even fix spelling to try and avoid the "How is Babby formed" type posts you find on Yahoo! Answers.
Yes, this is true. We spell and grammar check the popular questions on the service in order to make it a more pleasant experience... I know if I misspell something on the web I would appreciate someone fixing it for me, as opposed to 10 folks attacking me.
In fact, that's the other big secret of why Mahalo Answers is having a fairly strong start: we don't allow obnoxious behavior. If someone responds with "why don't you google it n00b?!!?" we delete the response and warn the person once before closing their account.
We have a "no a-hole" rule basically. I'm going to do an email newsletter about the things we've learned with community building. My email newsletter is at http://www.tinyurl.com/jasonslist if you're interested.
I don't think the downvotes were for the mistake that was made (forgetting about nofollow), but rather the perceived intent behind the post in the first place.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes 'copying' is great when somebody truly believes they can solve a problem better, but that doesn't seem the case here — the only new feature I see is that you can add a bounty to your question; other than that, I see no advantage over Yahoo! Answers.