Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think this news highlights a more general problem. How can we call something an "open standard" if it's controlled by one company in such a way that they can shut it down at whim. Open sourcing should be a requirement to be an "open standard", or am I missing something?


They are not shutting down the standard, they are dropping the support for it in services they host.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: