Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd be curious to see if Facebook and the rest use similar strategies to reduce the intra-datacenter processing and bandwidth, and if the savings achieved are worth anything significant.


You mean, letting the new feature go viral naturally rather than just blasting it to every person out there?


That's part of it. I was looking at it more from a computation/energy-efficiency perspective.


Yeah, I'd even be interested in knowing if Facebook breaks down their server costs to that level of detail, e.g., the operational cost of Algorithm A versus Algorithm B.

Since capital expenditures seems to be a big part of their costs they might just be that detailed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: