Yep. Or it's for "national security purposes". One of many beautiful euphemisms they employ.
This is completely absurd. Do people believe in a free and open Internet, or do they not? Government asking us to make "declarations" over the content we want access to or what we may or may not search for is an absurdly dangerous precedent.
IMO, imposing morality typically tends to make whatever problem worse.
> Do people believe in a free and open Internet, or do they not?
Not really. They want a special kind of freedom where censorship is not allowed... unless the stuff that's getting censored is the kind of stuff that they don't like. Lots of people would enthusiastically support their moral standards being written into law.
