Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As I understand, Google can go evil and use its patents to impose certain restrictions, like killing potential independent VP10 project or messing with webm's royalty-free status.


Since Google are offering them under a _irrevocable_ royalty free licence I don't see how you could have come to 'understand' it that way.

Do you have any references to your claims?


Citation?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: