Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And a promise, in the simplest definition, is not enforceable by law. That's why it's totally different from a contract.


The fact that one of the words is a subset of another depending on the context doesn't invalidate the fact that the words are still synonyms when they are used in a specific topic.

Moreover, by what you said before: > "Exchange" is the critical word. A single promise is extraordinarily different...

I would conclude that you are actually agreed on how I used it in my original comment:

> "and contracts might be dissolved if both sides of the contract agreed. This being an open promise is not a contract but a reaffirmation of a goal"

How that can be "100% wrong"?


The part that's wrong is the part I quoted.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: