Look at who is successful, note some random characteristics of these individuals or businesses and then come up with your own theory of how success is deliberately attained. The share it over the web.
What's even more amusing is when someone sings Google's praises as a company that "did things differently" and then proceeds to dismiss any future innovators (who choose to do things differently) in the markets that Google is in.
I have often thought Google is a grossly misunderstood company, despite many facts being readily available. I'm still waiting for someone to show me otherwise.
Some years back I watched a presentation where a representative of one of the internet's most respected infrastructure companies claimed that the secret of Google's success was diversification and not relying on one product (search). He suggested the winning strategy was to release numerous products and cited non-search Google's products as examples. However, every example was a product released by another company (who, go figure, focused exclusively on one product) that Google had acquired. Some folks do know the facts about Google, but I see an inordinately large number of folks who you think would know the facts, but sadly do not. Instead they have their theories and are eager to share.
Yes.
Look at who is successful, note some random characteristics of these individuals or businesses and then come up with your own theory of how success is deliberately attained. The share it over the web.
What's even more amusing is when someone sings Google's praises as a company that "did things differently" and then proceeds to dismiss any future innovators (who choose to do things differently) in the markets that Google is in.
I have often thought Google is a grossly misunderstood company, despite many facts being readily available. I'm still waiting for someone to show me otherwise.
Some years back I watched a presentation where a representative of one of the internet's most respected infrastructure companies claimed that the secret of Google's success was diversification and not relying on one product (search). He suggested the winning strategy was to release numerous products and cited non-search Google's products as examples. However, every example was a product released by another company (who, go figure, focused exclusively on one product) that Google had acquired. Some folks do know the facts about Google, but I see an inordinately large number of folks who you think would know the facts, but sadly do not. Instead they have their theories and are eager to share.