> He notes that the site was never 100 percent NSFW; his graph leaves out /r/reddit.com for purposes of legibility.
This is a problem of poor axis labelling. It should be: "Fraction of posts submitted to Reddit.com (excluding /r/reddit.com)". The other issue is that the other graphs that include /r/reddit.com are hidden in the slideshow at the top.
> He notes that the site was never 100 percent NSFW; his graph leaves out /r/reddit.com for purposes of legibility.
This is a problem of poor axis labelling. It should be: "Fraction of posts submitted to Reddit.com (excluding /r/reddit.com)". The other issue is that the other graphs that include /r/reddit.com are hidden in the slideshow at the top.
It's clearer in the actual blog post: http://www.randalolson.com/2013/03/12/retracing-the-evolutio...