Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, they picked a test route to be decently representative and allow them to setup their tests correctly. It is not an A to B thing. role_v's comment is a pretty good explanation https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7698495

The quote ghaff posted https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7698610 it seems like you are describing Google more than Volvo.



> role_v's comment is a pretty good explanation https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7698495

That's not an explanation, it's speculation just like my speculation is.


http://www.volvocars.com/intl/top/corporate/news/pages/defau...

note the:

Our aim is for the car to be able to handle all possible traffic scenarios by itself, including leaving the traffic flow and finding a safe ‘harbour’ if the driver for any reason is unable to regain control,” explains Erik Coelingh, Technical Specialist at Volvo Car Group.

Plus the goals listed.

Volvo did do a land-train style project called SARTRE http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1072088_sartre-self-drivi...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: