One of which was stripped of their status. Of the targeted group, less than a third were Republicans. If you bothered to put any effort into researching it you'd turn up the keyword list that includes the keywords.
I'm not sure why I get downvotes because I don't do all the work for people making accusations.
This wasn't some witch hunt. Everything with potential political leanings as well as a number of other non-political categories were flagged. This was because of Citizens United and the fact people were pushing the boundaries.
You keep posting links that don't support your claims.
Let's see, from your first link: According to ThinkProgress's analysis of the heavily redacted "be on the lookout" lists, the IRS may have targeted a higher number of progressive groups than conservative groups overall.
Really? ThinkProgress, a left-leaning organization, did an analysis that showed they weren't targeting conservatives, in fact they were mostly targeting progressive groups.
Provide a decent source and we can have a conversation.
I'm not sure why I get downvotes because I don't do all the work for people making accusations.
Since you are lazy:
http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/new-documents-show-t...
http://www.scribd.com/collections/4492912/IRS-Be-On-the-Look...
etc.
Provide evidence it isn't Republican Spin since you two are the ones making the accusations?
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/09/05/senate-report-confirm...
http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/rep...
This wasn't some witch hunt. Everything with potential political leanings as well as a number of other non-political categories were flagged. This was because of Citizens United and the fact people were pushing the boundaries.