Wow, what an incredibly lame response. Everyone knows small studies may not be replicable, what else does this comment add?
Reversing effects of Alzheimer's is incredibly rare, so doing so in a scientific and carefully observed manner is newsworthy. I've previously known of only two individuals who've had the disease being reversed of the millions who suffer from it, anyone can correct me if they know of others.
This is a terrible disease, so all progress is welcome. If society was interested in discovering a means to reverse it, the answer is actually simple. Take a few thousand patents (there are millions, not a problem to come up with this many), and randomly divide them into groups of 200 and assign them to teams of researchers who can use any combination of nutrients, diet, approved drug, etc. Offer a prize of $100M to the team with the treatment that works best and smaller amounts to runners up. Then repeat every two years.
Reversing effects of Alzheimer's is incredibly rare, so doing so in a scientific and carefully observed manner is newsworthy. I've previously known of only two individuals who've had the disease being reversed of the millions who suffer from it, anyone can correct me if they know of others.
This is a terrible disease, so all progress is welcome. If society was interested in discovering a means to reverse it, the answer is actually simple. Take a few thousand patents (there are millions, not a problem to come up with this many), and randomly divide them into groups of 200 and assign them to teams of researchers who can use any combination of nutrients, diet, approved drug, etc. Offer a prize of $100M to the team with the treatment that works best and smaller amounts to runners up. Then repeat every two years.