> Minimalism isn't timeless, minimalism itself is a trend in design.
i suppose. depending on the length of your view. but, given minimalism has been a "trend" for the last 100 years or so, i am going to assume you're looking at broad trending across centuries instead of through the "flat design is trendy" lens.
On that basis classical architecture and design have been far more successful than anything else.
There's a reason for that Roman word in Times New Roman.
Minimalism works well on small screens. But my guess is that as UI devices get bigger and more immersive we'll see more texture and decoration beginning to reappear; six feet of extreme white space is too much to hold interest as a container of useful content.
Incidentally, not a few Victorian and Edwardian (i.e. pre-Bauhaus) public buildings in the UK have amazingly rich and detailed designs. They were incredibly labour intensive building projects, and there's something very compelling about spaces that were built and decorated almost entirely by hand with expert craft and precision and take pride and pleasure in expensive decoration.
I'm not sure what the UI equivalent would be, but it's interesting to think about.
i suppose. depending on the length of your view. but, given minimalism has been a "trend" for the last 100 years or so, i am going to assume you're looking at broad trending across centuries instead of through the "flat design is trendy" lens.