Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I thought a conviction was sentenced based on the most severe available for a set of charges, not all charges cumulatively. There were a lot of articles recently about how the media often used some common misunderstanding to say someone faced "centuries" behind bars for something that probably would've maxed out around 20 years.


Running a "Continuing Criminal Enterprise" (one of the charges he was just convicted of) comes with a 20-year mandatory minimum sentence.

http://www.ussc.gov/guidelines-manual/2014/2014-chapter-2-d#...

Depending on how everything else stacks up, he could certainly see 25+ years, but most of the sentences will run concurrently.


Consecutive is the default if the judge doesn't specify. Some laws require consecutive. Other than that it is up to the judge to specify.

http://criminal.lawyers.com/criminal-law-basics/how-do-multi...

>If a judge wants to order the sentences to run consecutively or concurrently, she must state so specifically in the sentencing order, which is the court document that sets a defendant's sentences. If she doesn't do so, the sentences will run consecutively automatically.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: