Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I can imagine a lot of personal sites will suffer from this. With most, they're sitting on something like Eleven2 or Dreamhost, who requires a dedicated IP for an SSL certificate, which the user then has to buy and figure out for himself (it's not trivial for the average "webmaster"), or buy the certificate from their host which is marked-up plenty.

Yes, the hosts could wildcard. Yes, there are other solutions out there. But for the average Joe who is blogging about his vacations and family? They're going to be completely lost.

Why don't shared hosts just wildcard? Shared certificate? Well, let's think about it... Charging ~$5/month/dedicated IP is a nice upsell, and getting $70 for an installed SSL cert that costs them $10 from their SSL cert reseller, that takes them 2 minutes to configure... That's a nice slice of pie. I'd take that bet any day.



I think you're overstating how bad things are. Dreamhost, for example, no longer requires a dedicated IP for SSL, though they do still recommend it for e-commerce. They are charging $15/year for a CA-signed certificate. Granted, that's for a single-site cert and they don't support wildcards under this scenario, but the vacation blogger isn't likely to need that anyway.


Charging ~$5/month/dedicated IP is a nice upsell

It's only an upsell now. If in the future SSL is required to get access, it stops being an upsell and starts having to be part of the basic package. Whether that will raise prices significantly is yet to be seen.


> But for the average Joe who is blogging about his vacations and family? They're going to be completely lost.

Average Joe uses Facebook, Tumblr, Wordpress, or any number of existing hosts to blog to his family.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: